The Golden Calf Of Evolution
Is On Fire As more and more people
actually stop and THINK THROUGH the lunacy that evolution expects you to believe
on totally blind faith, evolution will finally be seen for what it truly is, a
religion pretending to be science. At that point the fire consuming the golden
calf of evolution will turn it to ashes.
By NoDNC.com staff
The recent notice that
Harvard was going to engage in “advocacy” research (it’s difficult to call the
advocacy science) shows how concerned the evolution camp is about the theory of
intelligent design. Contrary to popular myth, the theory of evolution has many
holes. The only way evolution continues to survive is because people don’t
actually stop to think about the absurd things that evolution requires one to
accept on totally blind faith.
If in fact evolution were truly a science,
then according to the scientific method, challenges to the theory of evolution,
even a challenge calling itself “intelligent design” would be readily accepted.
The whole notion of science is to put forth a theory, and then work to further
develop the theory, or abandon it, based on challenges to discrete aspects of
that theory. Real science not only accepts those challenges, but encourages them
to ensure its accuracy. Evolutionists routinely censor and attack all
dissent.
Now why would real scientists be so concerned about “intelligent
design?” Why would prestigious Harvard University commit to invest a million
dollars annually in a new program dedicated on the origins of life in relation
to evolution? And as Harvard chemistry professor David Liu noted "My
expectation, is that we will be able to reduce this to a very simple series of
logical events that could have taken place with no divine
intervention."
That is an interesting statement from a scientist. In
professional circles, this is called “confirmatory bias” and it is not about
science, but about making additional theories fit the predefined outcome that
you want them to fit. It is advocacy “research” and not science. After all, with
evolution, there is no way to test or verify history, so it is routine to just
“create” anything you can imagine to fill the void, anything except intelligent
design. Taking their cues from cults, when something doesn’t fit, just make up
something that can’t be verified.
The secret of why Darwinists
(evolutionists) see intelligent design as a threat is because in its simplest
form, it is not only verifiable, but intelligent design is an ideal corollary
[FN1] to the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Paraphrased that law says:
Any
system, on its own, moves from order to disorder, and eventually becomes totally
random.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics is considered an absolute,
solid, verified truth in science. The reason it is considered a “law” in science
is because it is said to apply to all matter in the entire universe and in all
situations and circumstances. It has been tested, re-tested, verified, and
re-verified and found to be a universal scientific truth.
Why is the
Second Law of Thermodynamics Important?
Evolution defies the Second Law
of Thermodynamics. In plain terms, it expects people to accept, on blind,
unverifiable faith, that out of disorder, and through a bunch of accidents,
order is created--, disorder becomes order.
Another way of looking at
that would be to think of a deck of cards, carefully shuffled and thrown high in
the air. With the expectation that eventually an “accident” would happen which
would cause all 52 cards in the deck, to fall in perfect order, and perfectly
aligned. [FN2]
Now we get to the interesting part, the part that
absolutely horrifies Darwinists and all evolutionists in particular. INTELLIGENT
DESIGN IS THE COROLLARY [See FN1] TO THE SECOND LAW OF
THERMODYNAMICS!
With external inputs of energy, directed in a specialized
way, disorder and randomness can be ordered.
Any system, whether open or
closed, requires specialized work or specialized energy input to go from
disorder to order. This same specialized work or specialized energy input is
also required just to maintain order.
Let’s look at it this way. If you
work at a desk, or construction, or homemaker, or whatever your job is, there
are parallels. Evolutionists expect you to believe that if you leave a mess long
enough, a set of accidents will eventually occur that will organize all your
papers, build a new house, or clean each room in your house, etc. This is plain
nonsense and not science.
Evolutionists realize that a COROLLARY to the
Second Law of Thermodynamics is both science, is testable, is verifiable, and is
true. This is why they are terrified. For evolution to “work” it requires that a
settled scientific LAW be changed to accommodate it. Evolution’s FALSE COROLLARY
to the Second Law of Thermodynamics expects one to accept the following
paraphrased idea:
With external inputs of energy, random or disordered
energy creates order.
In more “evolutionary” terms, enough accidents,
stacked on top of each other, for a long enough period of time, creates order
and perfection. Never mind that evolution also says that “natural selection”
destroys all “accidents” that don’t have almost immediate usefulness. It is
lunacy to believe that from random occurrence you gain greater and greater
order. It then becomes zealous fanaticism when you deny that this is anything
more than a secular fundamentalist belief system. In fact, this is in direct
defiance of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Under evolution, instead of moving
toward disorder, we are moving toward order.
On one hand we hear that
life has developed and “evolved” through “accidents” that create the variations
of the species. And in contradiction to everything coming about because of these
“accidents,” Darwin’s evolutionists say that “natural selection” does away with
the “accidents” and “chooses” the superior “accidents.” On one hand we have life
being created, derived, developed and sustained through “accidents,” and on the
other hand we have life being destroyed and killed off (natural selection)
because the accidents aren’t the “right type” of accident.
STOP AND THINK
about what evolution demands you to believe. Disorder creates order, accidents
fix things. This is not only intellectually dishonest, it is absurd when you
stop to think about it.
Is this Corollary Theory of the Second Law –
Intelligent Design – Testable?
Routinely we hear from the evolution crowd
that intelligent design is not testable. Not only is this blatantly false, the
Corollary to the Second Law of Thermodynamics (intelligent design) has been
proven over, and over, and over again. In fact, it continues to be proven many
thousands of times a day.
Every time a pharmaceutical medication is taken
to treat a disorder, whether it is physical or mental, it is a test of the
theory of intelligent design. The Pharmaceutical companies that research new
drug applications to treat disease not only defy “natural selection” but direct
energy and efforts to cure a disorder which results in a medication to treat the
disorder.
Every time a doctor performs a necessary surgery, that is
successful, it is not only a test of intelligent design, but proof that it is
valid. The Physician brings order to disorder and again defies “natural
selection.”
Over and over again, architect, electrical engineer,
physicist, chemist, veterinary, and any number of professions routinely cheat
“natural selection” with intelligent design. Over and over again evolution’s
“accidents” and “natural selections” are overcome by intelligent
design.
Is it any wonder that the evolution crowd is terrified by
intelligent design? Proving intelligent design disproves evolution. When
considering intelligent design as a corollary to the Second Law of
Thermodynamics, as well as easily tested and verified, it’s no wonder
evolutionists are frightened.
Why so narrowly confined?
When major
problems with evolution are raised, such as the INPUTS to the whole evolutionary
process, evolutionists shriek, almost in horrified pain “that doesn’t apply,” or
“that’s another area.” Take for example the origins of life itself. When raising
the proposition that the origins of the chemical INPUTS to life, and the origins
of life itself are critical building blocks to verify whether or not evolution
is valid, routine shrieks of “abiogenesis” or some other silly segment of the
process is invoked to defend the indefensible. These silly segmentations, which
alone may disprove evolution, are routinely segmented out of the idea of
evolution. These things are treated almost as if they must be warded off with
some magical talisman or incantation against any evil spirits that might
challenge the evolutionary cult. Evolutionists hide behind these silly,
ridiculous, and utterly absurd notions that you can build valid science on a
small piece of a process and leave out all of the pieces that the process
depends on.
When parts of the process not only demonstrate that the
sacred theory of evolution may be invalid or false, the shrieks of heresy and
blasphemy are raised. This isn’t science, it is utter madness disguised as
science. And certainly I can understand why the issue of the initial origins of
life terrify evolutionists. The idea of “abiogenesis” expects one to accept on
blind faith that life just “magically appeared” from some accidents with rocks,
water, and a few base chemicals. Evolution suggests that right after that life
was created, it began evolving. This is difficult to believe when you stop and
think about it. Life “magically appears” from rocks, water, and a few chemicals?
I’m still amazed that all those alchemists in the middle ages couldn’t find a
way to do something as simple as turning lead into gold. If they had simply
applied evolution’s teachings, water would have been gold, diamonds, and every
other form of precious gem.
Evolutionary theory demands that only
physical / material properties can be evaluated. This notion completely ignores
the fact that human beings have the ability to reason, to think through things,
to make value judgments, to make decisions, to choose right or wrong, to have
order and structure or to have disorder and chaos.
This is another point
of conflict, if you accept evolution’s true premises, only natural selection is
valid and all of our morals, values, and social structures aren’t valid. But
they exist and their very existence proves that evolution has more holes. So
what do the evolutionists do? No problem, they say that social structures just
don’t apply. It’s not “material” so we won’t even consider it.
Evolution
by other names is the law of the jungle, survival of the fittest, kill or be
killed, a form of “natural” eugenics, etc. So, if you remove the social
structures, the laws, rules, morals, values, the social structures, all you have
are wild animals.
The “law of the jungle” part of evolution is a glaring
defect and a strong demonstration that evolution misses the mark. There is
something more to human life than just “kill or be killed.” So what do the
evolutionists do? They simply spout their dogma “that doesn’t apply, we’re only
looking at the material world!” It’s easy to understand why they would do this,
under the idea of eugenics, Hitler slaughtered millions.
If you stop and
think about what “evolutionary processes” was required to create emotions,
social structure, values, order, and the awareness of “self,” it is easy to
understand why evolutionists are terrified of this. By their nature, by what
these things ARE, they are not “natural” evolutionary occurrences. By
themselves, they could not have come about by any type of evolutionary theory
known today. So having these “artificial” structures imposed on “evolution”
disproves evolution.
Evolution’s true believers treat any challenge to
their sacred cow as blasphemy or heresy --, I guess that’s a normal reaction to
a religious belief.
Evolutionists are terrified. And the debate must be
contained. If the debate is not contained, the public school indoctrination and
the cult of evolution will collapse. Once people actually stop and think about
the blind leaps of faith that evolution requires, it will be seen as the cult it
is. Evolution is nothing but wild religious beliefs clothed with the appearance
of science.
The golden calf of evolution is on fire. As more and more
people actually stop and THINK THROUGH the lunacy that evolution expects you to
believe on totally blind faith, evolution will finally be seen for what it truly
is, a religion pretending to be science. At that point the fire consuming the
golden calf of evolution will turn it to ashes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[FN1] A corollary is
something that is generally a “natural consequence” of the thing it is related
to. So when a corollary is based on something that is already proven, the
corollary generally does not require much proof because it is accepted and
understood. For example, water freezes and turns to ice at about 32 degrees (F)
depending on atmospheric conditions. A corollary would be that water melts as it
rises above 32 degrees (F).
[FN2] Before all of the shrieks from the
Darwinists, what I have just outlined is called an analogous syllogism, it is a
writing tool to help understand complex
issues.
Resources: DNA:
The Tiny Code That's Toppling Evolution (DNA is PROVING that evolution is a
hoax) The controversy over evolution includes a growing number of scientists
who challenge Darwinism. (The fraud of Darwinism...) Einstein Versus Darwin:
Intelligent Design Or Evolution? (Most LEGITIMATE Scientists do NOT agree with
Evolution) What’s the Big Secret? (Intelligent Design in
Pennsylvania) What are the Darwinists afraid of? (The fervent religious
belief in evolution) The Little Engine That Could...Undo Darwinism (Evolution
may be proven false very soon)